• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

First Work Disability Question

Challenge Issues Challenge Cases


Actual Earnings Use
Average Statistics
Basic Analysis Methodology
Broad Support
Census Bureau Caveat
Chronic Disability
Corcione Article
CPS Data Validity
CPS Definition of Work Disability
CPS Self-reported Disability
CPS Use by Other Researchers
Daubert/Kumho Standards - WLE
Employment, Earnings, & Disability
Expert Qualifications
First Work Disability Question
Hale Article
Hamel Letter
Heterogeneity
Medical Impairment Ratings
Multi-year Data Averaging
Offset Use
Possibility of Future Disability
Residual Capacity
Sample Selection Bias
Skoog & Toppino Article
Temporary Disability
VALE Software
Veteran's Disability

 

Usual Opposition Position
Some question the validity of the first work disability question contained in the Current Population Survey (CPS).
 
VEI Position
A key criteria in screening for work disability is this question from the Current Population Survey (CPS) survey: 

(Do you/Does anyone in this household) have a health problem or disability which prevents (you/them) from working or which limits the kind or amount of work (you/they) can do? 

Some doubt the validity of this question.  This question, however, is accepted as a valid one as shown by the fact that an almost identical question is used as the cornerstone in another major survey, the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), also conducted by the Census Bureau.   Similar questions are asked in the National Health Interview Survey, conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Panel Survey of Income Dynamics, conducted at the Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. 

Statistical analysis of CPS data (Gibson, 2001) demonstrates that 81% of those responding positively to this question also responded positively to one of the other six questions comprising the complete work disability definition.  Of the remaining 19%, the overall rate of employment is .77 – in line with the overall Not Severely Disabled rate of .73, and well below the Not Disabled rate.  If the question were as ambiguous as sometimes implied, one would not expect such consistency in responses or probability of employment.

 
Related Challenges
Achtar v. Green Fischer v. Whitson McGonigal v. Lucas
Mesman v. Crane    
 
Related Articles
Gamboa & Holland (2005) Gibson (2001) Gibson & Tierney (2000)
Skoog & Toppino (1999)    

Last modified: Tuesday April 03, 2007 02:56 PM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.