• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

CPS Use by Other Researchers

Challenge Issues Challenge Cases


Actual Earnings Use
Average Statistics
Basic Analysis Methodology
Broad Support
Census Bureau Caveat
Chronic Disability
Corcione Article
CPS Data Validity
CPS Definition of Work Disability
CPS Self-reported Disability
CPS Use by Other Researchers
Daubert/Kumho Standards - WLE
Employment, Earnings, & Disability
Expert Qualifications
First Work Disability Question
Hale Article
Hamel Letter
Heterogeneity
Medical Impairment Ratings
Multi-year Data Averaging
Offset Use
Possibility of Future Disability
Residual Capacity
Sample Selection Bias
Skoog & Toppino Article
Temporary Disability
VALE Software
Veteran's Disability

 

Usual Opposition Position
The usual position is that the Current Population Survey (CPS) is not relied on by anyone outside of VEI for studying the employment experiences of people with a disability.
 
VEI Position
The Tables and the data underlying them are used outside litigation.  In a 1992 article in the Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, authors Misra, Bua-lam, and Majumder discussed use of The Tables in improving benefit-cost analyses of rehabilitation programs. 

In addition, both government and non-government researchers rely on the CPS employment rates and earnings figures for non-forensic purposes.  Burkhauser, Daly, and Houtenville (2001), for example, used data from the March supplement of the CPS to compare the employment experience of people with and without disability during the 1990s business cycle.  This paper was published through the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RRTC) for Economic Research on Employment Policy for Persons with Disabilities at Cornell University.  The Cornell RRTC has also published several other papers using CPS data on persons with a work disability.  These include three papers by Houtenville (2000) that studied the prevalence, employment rates, and household income of people with disability, as well as a paper by Burkhauser, Houtenville, and Wittenburg (2001) that compared the employment trends of persons with work limitations using the CPS and two other government surveys. 

Daly and Burkhauser (2000) published a paper through the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco that used CPS data to study the work and income of men with disability.  Acemoglu and Angrist (2001), both with the Department of Economics at MIT, published a paper through the National Bureau of Economic Research that used CPS data to study the impact of the ADA on the employment of people with disability.

Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, also use CPS data to study persons with a disability.  This work includes an article published in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Monthly Labor Review (Yelin and Katz, 1994) that used both the CPS and the National Health Interview Survey to study the participation trends of people with and without disability during the period from 1970 to 1992.  Yelin (1996) and Yelin and Trupin (1997) used the CPS to study the participation and employment of people with and without disability during the mid-1990s.

Government researchers have also used CPS data to study the experiences of people with and without work disability.  The U.S. Census Bureau measured the participation and employment rates and average earnings of people with and without disability and published the results in two key documents (1983 and 1989).  In 2001, the Census Bureau issued a press release that included basic information from the CPS on the prevalence, employment, earnings, and education of people with a work disability.  In addition, Jack McNeil (2002), formerly with the Census Bureau, authored an article supporting use of the CPS for researching the effects of work disability on employment.

The research list above is not meant to be complete.  It does, however, give an idea of the variety of researchers using CPS data.  The use of the CPS by this sampling of government and non-government researchers corroborates the validity of the CPS for the purpose of studying the work experience of people with a work disability. 

 
Related Challenges
Anglin v. Reed Celarek v. Rutland Farina v. Hershey
Fischer v. Whitson Franks v. Caito Knee v. G.B. Supply
McCoy v. Huyear McGonigal v. Lucas Swiech v. Gottlieb
Walker v. Saligumba    
 
Related Articles
     

Last modified: Tuesday April 03, 2007 02:58 PM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.