• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Chronic Disability

Challenge Issues Challenge Cases


Actual Earnings Use
Average Statistics
Basic Analysis Methodology
Broad Support
Census Bureau Caveat
Chronic Disability
Corcione Article
CPS Data Validity
CPS Definition of Work Disability
CPS Self-reported Disability
CPS Use by Other Researchers
Daubert/Kumho Standards - WLE
Employment, Earnings, & Disability
Expert Qualifications
First Work Disability Question
Hale Article
Hamel Letter
Heterogeneity
Medical Impairment Ratings
Multi-year Data Averaging
Offset Use
Possibility of Future Disability
Residual Capacity
Sample Selection Bias
Skoog & Toppino Article
Temporary Disability
VALE Software
Veteran's Disability

 

Usual Opposition Position
Some feel that the presence in the CPS survey of people with a chronic disability, rather than a disability caused by a tort, distorts the disability data, rendering it invalid for studying the effects of disability on employment.
 
VEI Position
When looked at from a vocational perspective, many different types of conditions can result in identical work-related impairments (e.g., both a knee injury and a lung ailment can result in a restriction to sedentary work).  Impairments from non-injury related causes can result in work disability of varying degrees, with minimum to maximum impact.  What is relevant is the effect of the impairment, whatever the cause, on a person’s capacity to work and earn money. 

Even if a person disabled by a tort is more attached to the labor market, this does not mean that the person seeking employment will be successful, long-term or short-term.  An example is persons who have sustained traumatic brain injury.  Persons with this impairment are not always realistic regarding their limitations and tend to have poorer decision-making skills than persons without brain injury.  Despite their difficulties, and with the help of their pre-injury work experience, they may present well to prospective employers, enabling them to be hired.  Once on the jobs, however, their impairments can prevent them from performing as well as necessary, resulting in job failure or dismissal.

Another important point is that the CPS excludes institutionalized persons.  This excluded population likely holds a large fraction of the persons with chronic disability that are more likely to have no residual earning capacity.  The exclusion of this group reduces the possibility of distortion in the CPS. 
 
Related Challenges
Mesman v. Crane    
 
Related Articles
Gamboa & Holland (2005) Gibson (2001) Gibson & Tierney (2000)
Skoog & Toppino (1999)    

Last modified: Thursday January 26, 2006 04:11 PM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.