• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Broad Support

Challenge Issues Challenge Cases


Actual Earnings Use
Average Statistics
Basic Analysis Methodology
Broad Support
Census Bureau Caveat
Chronic Disability
Corcione Article
CPS Data Validity
CPS Definition of Work Disability
CPS Self-reported Disability
CPS Use by Other Researchers
Daubert/Kumho Standards - WLE
Employment, Earnings, & Disability
Expert Qualifications
First Work Disability Question
Hale Article
Hamel Letter
Heterogeneity
Medical Impairment Ratings
Multi-year Data Averaging
Offset Use
Possibility of Future Disability
Residual Capacity
Sample Selection Bias
Skoog & Toppino Article
Temporary Disability
VALE Software
Veteran's Disability

 

VEI Position
The presence of a disability is widely known to affect both earnings and worklife expectancy, regardless of the definition of disability used.  

Nonforensic researchers have used data from various studies to measure the effect of disability on employment.  Even those studies using definitions that are not specific to work disability have found that disability negatively impacts employment and earnings.  Kaye (1998) summarized findings from various surveys, including the CPS, SIPP, NHIS, and Harris Survey, and noted the existence of an earnings and employment discrepancy between people with and without disability. 

Burkhauser and Daly (1998), using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), also found an earnings discrepancy between those with and without disability.  McCollister and Pflaum (2004), using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), found a worklife drop for those with back pain and noted that this discrepancy increases with age.  Pflaum, et al. (2003) also found a drop in employment for those with a spinal cord injury and noted that the more severe injury, the lower the probability of finding and maintaining employment. 

Trupin and Yelin (1999) used data from the California Work and Health Survey, which defined disability as existing in those with physical functional limitation.  They found that people with disability had a lower labor force participation rate, were more likely unemployed, and more likely to be employed in part-time or temporary jobs.  

DeLeire (2000) used the SIPP and found that people with a disability work less and earn less than people with no disability.  Also, in the few years following passage of the ADA, men with disability were less likely to be employed relative to men with no disability than they had been in the few years prior to passage of the ADA.  In the few years prior to the ADA, men with disability had employment rates that were 63% as high as the rate for men without disability.  In the few years after the ADA, this rate dropped to 53% (DeLeire, 2000).  McNeil (2001) used SIPP data collected in 1997 and again found reduced employment and earnings for persons with both severe and nonsevere disability.

 
Related Challenges
     
 
Related Articles
     

Last modified: Thursday January 29, 2004 03:52 PM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.