• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Williams v. New York

VEI Challenges External Challenges


Montgomery v. Mitsubishi
Achtar v. Green
Artl v. Wright
Bennett v. Hidden Valley
Bentley v. Rose
Bernhard v. Bork
Bowman v. McClendon
Celarek v. Rutland
Davis v. Abad
Davis v. Henry Ford Hospital
Engle v. Urethane
Farina v. Hershey
Fischer v. Whitson
Franks v. Caito
Garibaldo v. Bandera
Greene v. Johnson
Gruener v. Ohio Casualty
Hunt v. Cam-Jo
Jones (Leonard) v. Randles
Kelly v. McFarland
Knee v. G.B. Supply
K v. Woodford
Langer v. Anderson
Lyons v. Follweiler
Maicki v. Johnson
Marcum v. Northern Indiana
McCoy v. Huyear
McGonigal v. Lucas
Mesman v. Crane
Middleton v. Sears
Parsons v. Gabbard
Presley v. CCS
Rogde v. Northeast IL RR
Saunders v. Webb
Shaheen v. Advantage
Snider v. Kotheimer
Swiech v. Gottlieb
Taylor v. Tomato Products
Walker v. Saligumba
Williams v. New York
Woods v. Elgin
Wright v. Jenkins
Wright v. Werner
Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf
Stichnoth v. Shafer

 

Full Citation Daniel Williams, Joseph Williams, Emmanuel Battle, Dellena Battle, infants by their mother and natural guardian, Debra Battle, and Debra Battle, Individually v. The City of New York and the New York City Department of Health; Index No. 9454/96
Court Supreme Court of the State of New York
Facts of Case Case involved four children who had sustained lead paint poisoning.  All four were diagnosed with cognitive disorders and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.  Full scale IQs ranged up to 84.  One child was also diagnosed with a receptive language disorder.  At the time of the reports, the children ranged in age from 6 to 18.
VEI Analysis Emmanuel - age 13; lost earnings calculated at $614,224
Dellena - age 6; lost earnings calculated at $399,015
Daniel - age 18; lost earnings calculated at $426,525
Joseph - age 17; lost earnings calculated at $533,420
All losses were based on a reduction in earnings and worklife expectancy and calculated using a pure offset.
(Reports - August 8, 2000)
Challenge Motion (May 7, 2001)
Challenge Issues Definition of work disability
Lifelong effect of work disability
VALE software
Expert qualifications
Elcock v. Kmart
Michels v. United States
VEI response VEI Affidavit (May 2001)
Results Challenge unsuccessful
 

Last modified: Thursday August 07, 2003 10:52 AM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.