• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Langer v. Anderson

VEI Challenges External Challenges


Montgomery v. Mitsubishi
Achtar v. Green
Artl v. Wright
Bennett v. Hidden Valley
Bentley v. Rose
Bernhard v. Bork
Bowman v. McClendon
Celarek v. Rutland
Davis v. Abad
Davis v. Henry Ford Hospital
Engle v. Urethane
Farina v. Hershey
Fischer v. Whitson
Franks v. Caito
Garibaldo v. Bandera
Greene v. Johnson
Gruener v. Ohio Casualty
Hunt v. Cam-Jo
Jones (Leonard) v. Randles
Kelly v. McFarland
Knee v. G.B. Supply
K v. Woodford
Langer v. Anderson
Lyons v. Follweiler
Maicki v. Johnson
Marcum v. Northern Indiana
McCoy v. Huyear
McGonigal v. Lucas
Mesman v. Crane
Middleton v. Sears
Parsons v. Gabbard
Presley v. CCS
Rogde v. Northeast IL RR
Saunders v. Webb
Shaheen v. Advantage
Snider v. Kotheimer
Swiech v. Gottlieb
Taylor v. Tomato Products
Walker v. Saligumba
Williams v. New York
Woods v. Elgin
Wright v. Jenkins
Wright v. Werner
Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf
Stichnoth v. Shafer

 

Full Citation Douglas Leo Langer v. Gary Michael Anderson; Court File No. C1-02-1211
Court Polk County, Minnesota; Ninth Judicial District
Facts of Case Male, high school graduate with neck, head, and upper back injuries resulting in frequent pain and problems with lifting, pushing/pulling, and working overhead
VEI Analysis Loss of earnings of $283,183 based on a reduction in worklife expectancy only (Report – March 19, 2003)
Challenge

Motion (March 2003)

Challenge Issues

Use of statistical averages

Speculative nature of analysis

Response

Attorney's Response (March 2003)

Results Challenge unsuccessful; Order (March 17, 2003)

 


Last modified: Thursday August 07, 2003 10:52 AM

 



Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.