• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Kelly v. McFarland

VEI Challenges External Challenges


Montgomery v. Mitsubishi
Achtar v. Green
Artl v. Wright
Bennett v. Hidden Valley
Bentley v. Rose
Bernhard v. Bork
Bowman v. McClendon
Celarek v. Rutland
Davis v. Abad
Davis v. Henry Ford Hospital
Engle v. Urethane
Farina v. Hershey
Fischer v. Whitson
Franks v. Caito
Garibaldo v. Bandera
Greene v. Johnson
Gruener v. Ohio Casualty
Hunt v. Cam-Jo
Jones (Leonard) v. Randles
Kelly v. McFarland
Knee v. G.B. Supply
K v. Woodford
Langer v. Anderson
Lyons v. Follweiler
Maicki v. Johnson
Marcum v. Northern Indiana
McCoy v. Huyear
McGonigal v. Lucas
Mesman v. Crane
Middleton v. Sears
Parsons v. Gabbard
Presley v. CCS
Rogde v. Northeast IL RR
Saunders v. Webb
Shaheen v. Advantage
Snider v. Kotheimer
Swiech v. Gottlieb
Taylor v. Tomato Products
Walker v. Saligumba
Williams v. New York
Woods v. Elgin
Wright v. Jenkins
Wright v. Werner
Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf
Stichnoth v. Shafer

 

Full Citation Randy Kelly, et al., v. Belinda McFarland, et al., and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company and John Deere Insurance Company; Civil Action No. 99-435-JMH
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, Lexington
Facts of Case Female with two years of college sustained head and facial injuries resulting in constant pain and difficulties with standing, walking, bending, climbing, lifting more than 20 pounds, concentration, memory, making decisions, learning new material, organizing complex information, following directions, and depression  
VEI Analysis Lost earnings in a range from $590,185 to $757,521 based on a reduction in earnings and worklife
Challenge Not received
Challenge Issues

Expert qualifications

Medical support

Pre-injury and post-injury earning capacity

VEI response VEI was not given the opportunity to respond to this challenge; knowledge of the challenge was received after the judge's opinion was issued.  Plaintiff attorney issued no defense of the challenge, leaving the judge no choice but to grant the motion to exclude testimony.
Results Challenge successful (May 24, 2002)
 

Last modified: Thursday August 07, 2003 10:52 AM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.