• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Hunt v. Cam-Jo

VEI Challenges External Challenges


Montgomery v. Mitsubishi
Achtar v. Green
Artl v. Wright
Bennett v. Hidden Valley
Bentley v. Rose
Bernhard v. Bork
Bowman v. McClendon
Celarek v. Rutland
Davis v. Abad
Davis v. Henry Ford Hospital
Engle v. Urethane
Farina v. Hershey
Fischer v. Whitson
Franks v. Caito
Garibaldo v. Bandera
Greene v. Johnson
Gruener v. Ohio Casualty
Hunt v. Cam-Jo
Jones (Leonard) v. Randles
Kelly v. McFarland
Knee v. G.B. Supply
K v. Woodford
Langer v. Anderson
Lyons v. Follweiler
Maicki v. Johnson
Marcum v. Northern Indiana
McCoy v. Huyear
McGonigal v. Lucas
Mesman v. Crane
Middleton v. Sears
Parsons v. Gabbard
Presley v. CCS
Rogde v. Northeast IL RR
Saunders v. Webb
Shaheen v. Advantage
Snider v. Kotheimer
Swiech v. Gottlieb
Taylor v. Tomato Products
Walker v. Saligumba
Williams v. New York
Woods v. Elgin
Wright v. Jenkins
Wright v. Werner
Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf
Stichnoth v. Shafer

 

Full Citation Deanna L. Hunt v. Cam-Jo, Inc. and Garrath N. McKinley; Ref. 03-2776-CI-21
Court Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County, Florida
Facts of Case Female with high school diploma with neck, back, and left shoulder injuries resulting in constant pain and difficulties with standing, walking, bending, heavy household chores and fatigue (Report - September 9, 2005)
VEI Analysis Lost earnings in a range of $133,952 to $155,149 based on a reduction in earnings and worklife expectancy
Challenge Motion (October 2005)
Challenge Issues

Expert qualifications

General acceptance

Articles by other authors

VEI response

Response (October 2005) 

Results Pending
 
Last modified: Friday February 10, 2006 02:26 PM

Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.