• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf

VEI Challenges External Challenges


Montgomery v. Mitsubishi
Achtar v. Green
Artl v. Wright
Bennett v. Hidden Valley
Bentley v. Rose
Bernhard v. Bork
Bowman v. McClendon
Celarek v. Rutland
Davis v. Abad
Davis v. Henry Ford Hospital
Engle v. Urethane
Farina v. Hershey
Fischer v. Whitson
Franks v. Caito
Garibaldo v. Bandera
Greene v. Johnson
Gruener v. Ohio Casualty
Hunt v. Cam-Jo
Jones (Leonard) v. Randles
Kelly v. McFarland
Knee v. G.B. Supply
K v. Woodford
Langer v. Anderson
Lyons v. Follweiler
Maicki v. Johnson
Marcum v. Northern Indiana
McCoy v. Huyear
McGonigal v. Lucas
Mesman v. Crane
Middleton v. Sears
Parsons v. Gabbard
Presley v. CCS
Rogde v. Northeast IL RR
Saunders v. Webb
Shaheen v. Advantage
Snider v. Kotheimer
Swiech v. Gottlieb
Taylor v. Tomato Products
Walker v. Saligumba
Williams v. New York
Woods v. Elgin
Wright v. Jenkins
Wright v. Werner
Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf
Stichnoth v. Shafer

 

Full Citation Cynthia Holland-Tucker and Everett Tucker vs. Kempf Contracting and Design, Inc., Cause No. 19C01-CT-0485
Court State of Indiana, Dubois Circuit Court
Facts of Case Female with injury to the lower back, bilateral hips and pelvis and right wrist resulting in restricted work environment
VEI Analysis Loss of earnings of the $466,640 based on a reduction of earnings and worklife expectancy (Report - September 19, 2006)
Challenge

Motion

Challenge Issues

Expert qualifications

Application of the "physical disability" definition from ACS to plaintiff

VEI response

Challenge Unsuccessful

 


Last modified: Friday August 17, 2007 11:12 AM



Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.