• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

Elcock v. Kmart

VEI Challenges External Challenges


Anglin v. Reed
Elcock v. Kmart
Garland v. Rossknecht
Hough-Scoma v. Wal-Mart
Jackson v. Roadway Express
Michels v. United States
Nilavar v. Osborn
Petridge v. Hewlett-Packard
Phillips v. Industrial Machine
Schieber v. City of Philadelphia
Scott v. Pyn
Scupp, Peterson v. Grabel

 

Full Citation Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart Corporation; No. 98-7472
Court Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Facts of Case Female sustained back and leg injuries in a fall; unable to continue in her full capacity as a Mary Kay Cosmetics dealer
Challenge Issues This case has been cited as one disallowing use of The New Worklife Expectancy Tables (The Tables).
VEI Observation This case does not mention The Tables.  The vocational rehabilitation expert in the case notes that he applied a procedure recommended by Anthony Gamboa (author of The Tables) in determining the plaintiff’s loss, a procedure that the defense did not dispute was an accepted methodology in the vocational rehabilitation field.  The Tables are not mentioned in the decision by either the vocational or the economic expert. 

The court in this case noted that Daubert hearings are appropriate for vocational and economic testimony.  It remanded the case for a new trial on economic damages to include a Daubert hearing.  

Results Opinion (October 10, 2000)
 
Last modified: Thursday August 07, 2003 10:52 AM

Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.