• Home • VEI Main Site • Econometrics • Search •

VEI Challenges

Challenge Issues Challenge Cases


VEI Challenges
External Challenges

 

This page provides links all recent cases involving challenges to VEI experts and their data or methodology to exclude expert testimony. 

Case Citation Summary Issues Involved
Achtar v. Green; Kentucky Male physician with cognitive, behavioral, and physical limitations

Expert qualifications

Medical support

Validity of the CPS data

Validity of the first disability question

Census caveat

Hale article

Rough approximation

Artl v. Wright; Ohio Male with some college education with a neck injury

Use of statistical averages

Expert qualifications

Second analysis assuming college completion

Bennett v. Hidden Valley; Missouri Female with head injury sustained at age 16

Daubert standards

Use of statistical averages

Bentley v. Rose; Kentucky Female with one year of college with back, head, shoulder, and hip injuries

Expert qualifications

Use of statistical averages

Speculative nature of analysis

Bernhard v. Bork; Illinois Male painter with right shoulder injury and PTSD.  Client has ongoing PTSD-related problems. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (hereinafter referred to as PTSD) and its congruence with the definition of cognitive disability;

Not a medical doctor;

Use of a proxy vs. actual wage history;

Application of cohort group data;

Use of statistical averages.

 

Bowman v. McClendon; Indiana Male with 7 years of education with neck and back injuries

Daubert standards

Census Bureau caveat

Validity of CPS data

Use of statistical averages

Heterogeneity

Lack of exogeneity/self-reported disability

Sample selection bias

Skoog and Toppino article

Celarek v. Rutland; Illinois Female college student with head, hip, and left wrist injuries

Being barred from testifying

Definition of disability

Validity of CPS data

Temporary disability

Permanent disability

Probability of future disability

Use of statistical average

Phillips v. Industrial Machine

General acceptance

CPS use by other researchers

Assessment of Ms. Celarek

Affidavit of defendant's economic expert

Davis v. Abad; Ohio Female, some high school with neck injury Residual capacity

Expert qualifications

Davis v. Henry Ford Hospital; Michigan Male child with hydrocephalus and seizure disorder

Expert qualifications

Reliability of the methodology

General acceptance and peer review

Self-reported disability

Fringe benefits

Wage growth

Engle v. Urethane; Kentucky Male, high school graduate with injuries to his head, left arm, and knee

Expert qualifications

Medical support

Lifelong effect of work disability

Medical impairment ratings

Farina v. Hershey; Pennsylvania Female with some college with leg injury

Expert qualifications

Medical support

Residual capacity

Fringe benefits

Definition of disability

Validity of CPS data

Probability of future disability

Use of statistical average

Methodology

CPS use by other researchers

Relevance to Ms. Farina

Fischer v. Whitson; Indiana Male, high school graduate with bilateral eye injuries

Expert qualifications

Peer review and general acceptance

Census Bureau caveat

Validity of CPS data

Self-reported disability

Validity of the first disability question

Heterogeneity

Sample selection bias

CPS use by other researchers

Use of statistical average

Assessment of Mr. Fischer

Franks v. Caito; Indiana Male, high school graduate with shoulder, neck, and head injuries

Residual capacity

Assessment of Mr. Franks

Validity of CPS data

Definition of disability

Use of statistical average

Self-reported disability

CPS use by other researchers

Daubert standards

Corcione article

Hale article

Rodgers article

Michels v. United States

Garibaldo v. Bandera; Texas Death case of two males, both with 10 years of education

Expert qualifications

Use of computer software

Use of occupation-specific dollar for younger decedent

Offset use

Greene v. Johnson; Indiana Male high school graduate with a back injury

Earning capacity

Work disability

Pre-existing condition

Gruener v. Ohio Casualty; Ohio Employment discrimination involving a female, high school graduate

Expert qualifications

Purpose of assessment

Definition of disability

Use of statistical average

Fit of opinion

Hough-Scoma v. Wal-Mart

Holland-Tucker vs. Kempf Contracting & Design, Inc.; Indiana Female with injury to the lower back, bilateral hips and pelvis and right wrist resulting in restricted work environment

Expert Qualifications

Hunt v. Cam-Jo; Florida Female with high school diploma with neck, back, and shoulder injuries

Expert qualifications

General acceptance

Articles by other authors

Jones (Leonard) v. Randles; Texas Death case of a married male with a high school equivalency diploma

Expert qualifications

Reliability of methodology

Use of computer software

Use of methodology outside VEI/litigation

Offset use

Relevance (fit) of opinion

Kelly v. McFarland; Kentucky Female with two years of college with head and facial injuries

Expert qualifications

Medical support

Pre- and post-injury earning capacity

Knee v. G.B. Supply; Nevada Female, high school graduate with back, head, and left shoulder injuries

Validity of CPS data

CPS use by other economists

Daubert standards

Phillips v. Industrial Machine

K  v. Woodford; Texas Male, college graduate with neck, head, arm, and pelvis injuries

Use of statistical averages

Fit of opinion

Langer v. Anderson; Minnesota Male, high school graduate with neck, head, and upper back injuries

Use of statistical averages

Speculative nature of analysis

Lyons v. Follweiler; Pennsylvania Female attorney with head, neck, and right shoulder injuries

Residual Capacity

Medical support

Expert qualifications

Maicki v. Johnson; Indiana Male, high school graduate with low back injury

Daubert standards

Marcum v. Northern Indiana; Indiana Male, high school graduate with shoulder and foot injuries

Pre-injury earning capacity

Expert qualifications

McCoy v. Huyear; Kentucky Male, high school graduate with low back injury

Expert qualifications

Daubert standards

Relevance to Mr. McCoy

Validity of CPS data

CPS use by other researchers

Use of statistical averages

Michels v. United States

Phillips v. Industrial Machine

Elcock v. Kmart

McGonigal v. Lucas; Indiana Female high school graduate with neck and knee injuries

Census Bureau caveat

Validity of CPS data

Heterogeneity

Self-reported disability

Validity of the first disability question

Letter from Harvey Hamel

Skoog & Toppino article

CPS use by other researchers

Life, Participation, Employment methodology

Daubert/Kumho factors

Use of statistical average

Assessment of Ms. McGonigal

Mesman v. Crane; Illinois Male with two years of college with knee injuries and subsequent below-the-knee amputation of the left leg

Expert qualifications

Use of computer software

Daubert standards

Hale article

Validity of the first disability question

Temporary disability

Chronic disability

Probability of future disability

Use of statistical averages

Middleton v. Sears; Texas Female, college graduate with right leg and left ankle injuries

Expert qualifications

Validity of CPS data

Definition of work disability

General acceptance

Parsons v. Gabbard; Kentucky Male with two years of college with back, neck, and left leg injuries

Expert qualifications

Validity of CPS data

Presley v. CCS; Kentucky Death case of male high school graduate

Relevance to Mr. Presley

Second analysis assuming promotion

Relevance of fringe benefit calculation

Relevance of household services calculation

Worklife expectancy calculations

Rogde v. Northeast IL Railroad; Illinois Male, high school graduate with back injury

"Employment, Earnings, and Disability"

Daubert standards

Elcock v. Kmart

Hough-Scoma v. Wal-Mart

Saunders v. Webb; Kentucky Female with one year of college with head and neck injuries

Expert qualifications

Basic Methodology

Shaheen v. Advantage; Illinois Male attorney with head, pelvic, and spinal injuries

Lifetime effect of work disability

Knowledge beyond the ken of the average juror

Effort to limit testimony

Snider v. Kotheimer; Kentucky Female with skull fracture sustained at birth with seizure disorder and marked developmental delays Expert qualifications
Stichnoth v. Shafer; Indiana Male college graduate with a sustained injury to the head, neck, and back as the result of a diving accident.

Expert qualifications

Reliability of Methodology

Current Population Survey and American Community Survey

Validity of the CPS data

Medical versus Vocational Testimony

Fit of the data with the facts of the case

Jackson vs. Roadway Express, Inc.

Use of computer software

Swiech v. Gottlieb; Illinois Female with some college education with a variety of exertional and nonexertional limitations

Expert qualifications

CPS use by other researchers

Validity of CPS data

Puleo v. McGladrey & Pullen

Hough-Scoma v. Wal-Mart

Phillips v. Industrial Machine

Taylor v. Tomato Products; Indiana Male with ten years of education with a knee injury

Validity of CPS data

Definition of work disability

Medical support

Lifelong effect of work disability

Walker v. Saligumba; California Female college graduate with injuries to head, back, neck, and right hand, wrist, and shoulder

Medical support for opinion

Support for worklife diminution

Expert qualifications

General acceptance

CPS use by other researchers

Self-reported disability

CPS definition of disability

CPS data validity

Williams et al. v. New York Four children sustained lead paint poisoning.  All were diagnosed with cognitive disorder and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.  Full scale IQs were 84 or lower.

Definition of work disability

Lifelong effect of work disability

VALE software

Expert qualifications

Elcock v. Kmart

Michels v. United States

Woods v. Elgin Railroad; Illinois Male with 10 years of education with cervical spine and rotator cuff injuries

Pre-injury earnings speculative

Daubert standards

Wright v. Jenkins; Indiana Male with two years of college with right foot injuries

Expert qualifications

Validity of CPS data

Definition of work disability

VALE software

Basic methodology

Phillips v. Industrial Machine

Daubert standards

Wright v. Werner; Kentucky Male with associates degree and pursuing bachelor's with back, neck, and head injuries

Expert qualifications

Reliability of methodology

Validity of CPS data

Skoog & Toppino article

"Employment, Earnings, and Disability"

Hale article

Use of statistical average

Medical impairment ratings

Use of case-specific data

Phillips v. Industrial Machine

Return to top


Last modified: Tuesday December 04, 2007 04:11 PM


Several links in this site are to documents that require the Acrobat ® Reader ® software.  Click logo for information on this free software
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to VEI Webmaster.